Group
No. _________ Section:
_________________
Title: ___________________________
Title: ___________________________
85 - 88 %
| 89 - 92 % | 93 - 96% | 97 - 100% |
TOTAL
|
|
Organization
|
Audience cannot understand video because
there is no clear narrative line.
|
Audience has difficulty following video
because information jumps around and main points or themes are unclear.
|
Video information are posted in logical
sequence which audience can follow.
|
Video information in logical,
interesting sequence which audience can follow.
|
|
Subject Knowledge
|
Does not have grasp of information;
student cannot articulate basic and core concepts
|
Unfamiliar with information and does not
provide clear illustrations or examples.
|
At ease with core concepts but fails to
elaborate.
|
Demonstrates full knowledge (more than
required) by providing explanations and elaboration.
|
|
Presentation of Ideas and Self•
|
Design does not support information or
audience needs and there is no evidence of appropriate use of video.
|
Design is designed to present
information but elements are not used correctly* and design detracts from
content
|
Design does not detract from content and
media elements support message*.
|
Design clearly supports learning, and
media use is exemplary.
|
|
Elements |
The camera work is choppy and the scenes are blurry
or panning is too fast. Sound and visual files contain significant
distortion. Transitions are awkward between scenes. Titles are illegible.
Technical difficulties seriously interfere with the viewer's ability to see,
hear, or understand content.
|
The camera work may be choppy or panning is too
fast. Sound and visual files may have some distortion but it doesn't distract
the viewer. There are some technical problems, but the viewer is able to
follow the presentation.
|
The camera work is generally smooth and the focus is
usually crisp. Sound and visual files are mostly distortion free. Transitions
provide a smooth movement between scenes. Titles are mostly legible. There
are few technical problems.
|
The camera work is smooth and the focus is crisp.
Sound and visual files are distortion free. Transitions are timed for smooth
movement between scenes. Titles are legible. There are few technical
problems, and none of a serious nature.
|
|
Collaboration
|
Obvious that the presentation was created by one
person Students make poor choices for group members. The group is unable to complete the video in a timely fashion |
Presentation a result of a group effort, but only
some members contributed Students select group members according to social desires. Some students in the group participate actively. Few students excel in the activities |
Students worked together and were assigned different
roles Students select group members based on good working relationships. All students in the group participate actively 100% of the time. Most students excel in the activities |
Effective teamwork. The final product represents
something that would have been impossible to accomplish working alone. Students select group members based on good working relationships. All students in the group participate actively 100% of the time. Each student excels in every activity |
No comments:
Post a Comment